1. Library Development
Required schematic symbols, PCB footprints and component data are created, reviewed and verified before placement begins.
Reviewing and approving major PCB design stages before downstream work begins can reduce unnecessary rework, clarify project scope and help keep design schedules and costs under control.
PCB design is a dependent engineering process. Placement decisions influence routing, routing depends on the approved stackup and constraints, and final manufacturing files depend on the completed and reviewed layout.
A change made early in the project may affect only a small amount of work. The same change made after placement and routing have been completed can require previously approved work to be modified or repeated.
For example, moving a critical component after routing has started may require traces to be removed and rerouted. The change can also affect differential pairs, length-matched signals, return paths, power distribution, mechanical clearances and other nearby circuitry.
To reduce this risk, 911EDA progresses through PCB design in defined stages and coordinates customer review and approval before advancing into major downstream work.
Each phase establishes information that becomes the foundation for the next stage of the PCB design process.
Required schematic symbols, PCB footprints and component data are created, reviewed and verified before placement begins.
Connectors, BGAs, major power sections and other mechanically or electrically critical components are placed first so the overall board architecture can be reviewed.
Remaining components are placed and refined around signal flow, mechanical clearances, height restrictions, keepouts, thermal requirements and routing feasibility.
High-speed interfaces, differential pairs, matched-length groups, controlled-impedance signals, BGA escapes and other critical connections are routed and reviewed.
Remaining signal routing, power and ground connections, copper areas, stitching and design-rule verification are completed.
After final approval, the native design database and specified fabrication, assembly and documentation outputs are prepared for release.
The objective of a staged review process is not to prevent design changes. Changes are sometimes necessary as product requirements develop, components become unavailable, mechanical information changes or engineering decisions evolve.
The purpose of each checkpoint is to make sure the customer has an opportunity to review important design decisions before additional work is built on top of them.
When critical placement is approved, for example, routing can proceed using that placement as an established design foundation. When complete placement is approved, the project can move more confidently into broader routing work.
Staged approvals establish clear decision points and help customers understand when a requested change may affect work that has already been completed.
Consider a board where component placement has been reviewed and approved and the PCB designer has begun routing critical interfaces.
If a component must later be moved to a different area of the board, the existing traces connected to that component may no longer be usable. Nearby routing may also need to move to make room for the revised placement.
On a complex board, the effect may extend beyond those individual nets. Length matching may need to be repeated, differential-pair geometry may change, power and ground connections may require modification and existing routing channels may need to be reorganized.
Customer-requested changes are a normal part of many engineering projects. When a change affects work that has not yet begun, the impact may be relatively small.
When the requested change alters previously approved work or expands the original statement of work, additional engineering effort may be required. In those situations, the project schedule and pricing may need to be adjusted.
When 911EDA identifies a change that is likely to affect scope, schedule or cost, the impact is discussed with the customer so the project can proceed with a clear understanding of the revised requirements.
Good project preparation and timely technical reviews make the staged process more effective.
Requirements do not always need to be perfect at the beginning of a project, but major electrical, mechanical and manufacturing constraints should be identified as early as practical.
Send the available design files, project requirements, expected deliverables and target schedule for review.